Email this article
  Printable version



Man hopes to legalize marijuana in Durango

Sensible Durango collecting signatures for 2010 ballot


Herald Staff Writer
Article Last Updated; Saturday, November 07, 2009  10:43AM

	Corey Chavez, director of Sensible Durango, holds up a copy of the proposed ordinance to “remove criminal penalties from the City Code for the private possession and use of marijuana by those twenty-one (21) years of age or older.”
Photo by STEVE LEWIS/Herald

Corey Chavez, director of Sensible Durango, holds up a copy of the proposed ordinance to “remove criminal penalties from the City Code for the private possession and use of marijuana by those twenty-one (21) years of age or older.”


A group called Sensible Durango wants voters to decide in November 2010 whether to decriminalize marijuana - at least when it comes to the City Code.

Sensible Durango is gathering signatures from city voters in an effort to force a ballot question that asks: Should the city of Durango adopt "An Ordinance to Establish a Sensible Marijuana Policy in Durango" that would remove criminal penalties from the City Code for the private possession and use of marijuana by those 21 or older?

"People from all walks of life have experience with it and use it regularly."

- Corey Chavez, Sensible Durango

The possession limit would be 1 ounce.

The proposed ballot question is similar to one that passed earlier this week in Breckenridge, with 71 percent of the votes in favor. Denver approved a similar measure in 2007.

But they are largely symbolic measures, because the use or possession of marijuana remains illegal under state law unless individuals have medical approval.

Brian Vicente, executive director of Denver-based Sensible Colorado, said decriminalizing marijuana gives police discretion to decide whether to cite residents for marijuana.

"We're hoping (Breckenridge police) will choose not to use their discretion, to reflect the overall will of the voters," he said.

Efforts to reach a Durango Police Department spokeswoman for comment Friday afternoon were unsuccessful. City employees were on a furlough day Friday.

In order to trigger a vote in Durango, a certain percentage of registered voters must sign a petition.

Corey Chavez, 24, director of Sensible Durango, estimates about 1,200 city voters must sign the petition to force a vote. But he plans to collect about 4,000 signatures.

"I think Durango will be the next city to pass an initiative," Chavez said Friday.

Fifty-four percent of La Plata County voters approved Amendment 44 in 2007, which would have amended Colorado state law to remove all penalties for possession of up to 1 ounce of marijuana by adults 21 or older. The measure failed statewide.

By decriminalizing marijuana in Durango, Chavez hopes to start a discussion that will eventually lead to the legalization of marijuana statewide.

As communities across the state begin to legalize marijuana, voters will be better educated and more willing to approve a statewide measure next time it is presented, Vicente said.

"It's local communities like Durango that lead the way," Vicente said. "We can't sit back and wait for the state to take action. We have to take local action."

Chavez said he supports the legalization of marijuana because it is safer than alcohol and should be treated accordingly. Legalizing marijuana would take it out of the hands of the "black market" and allow the government to regulate it, he said. And that could generate tax revenue for the state.

"It's widely used and a very popular recreational substance," Chavez said. "People from all walks of life have experience with it and use it regularly."

When contacted Friday, City Manager Ron LeBlanc said he was unaware of the group's petition effort.

But he said it will be important to evaluate the initiative from a "community perspective" - possibly even creating a task force to evaluate various viewpoints and concerns on the part of residents.

When residents bypass the governing body by going to the voters, some details are overlooked, LeBlanc said. For example, it is possible the new law will conflict with existing laws.

If such a ballot measure were to pass, LeBlanc said he'd like to be ready to enact any new ordinance that may be necessary to prevent discrepancies or address other concerns.

If there is overwhelming support for the ballot measure, it may not be necessary to put it to a vote, LeBlanc said, because the governing body may wish to change the code itself.

shane@durangoherald.com

  1. Saturday, November 07, 2009
    at 11:34:19 AM

    Suggest removal

    Nick says...

    Personally I hope this goes through. Although it might not have a definite effect on the number of arrests county wide I still think it is a step in the right direction. I don't use marijuana however my mother is a licensed medical marijuana patient and I am her caregiver, she suffers from 5 of the ailments that qualify a person to receive a license. With this said I have seen how marijuana can help people but I still believe there is a distinct difference between use and abuse, and chances are if you are driving stoned you most likely fall under the the latter category.

  2. Saturday, November 07, 2009
    at 9:45:23 AM

    Suggest removal

    Ryan says...

    Douglas, there is no doubt stoned drivers have been on our highways in droves since the 1960's. Also no doubt that drunks are responsible for numerous deaths each year. Problem is there is no way to determine how high someone is behind the wheel as there is for alcohol. Also the average THC content in the 1960's hovered around 1.5%. These days growers have become much more sophisticated and can now produce pot that is around 25% - 30% THC content. Until these matters can be addressed, you will not see Marijuana become fully legalized.

  3. Saturday, November 07, 2009
    at 8:16:54 AM

    Suggest removal

    ponomo says...

    Neither one, potsmokers or drunks, should be driving...Douglas Longcor.
    I have had relatives (nephew and brother-in-law) killed by a driver that was "high." Put the pipe away, D. Longcor. Just go for a walk in he park.

  4. Saturday, November 07, 2009
    at 7:32:14 AM

    Suggest removal

    ponomo says...

    I agree with jat.
    But wait---every irresponsibility will be covered under nationalized health
    care. ... legal and "illegal." What a great feeling!

Comments for this article have timed out

Durango Colorado ClassifiedsPlace a classifieds ad
advertisement
• Prudential Triple S Realty Durango Colorado Real Estate
Phone: 970-247-3840
Email Now!
Visit website

Every four weeks, Prudential Triple S Realty publishes our informative newsletter, "real estate review". Current issues and back issues available at www.PrudentialTripleS.com.

Visit our website to download your copy today.


Durango Herald Calendar of Events

March 2010
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
February   April


Contact Us | RSS | Relocation Package | Who Can Do It | Links | Site FAQ | Archives | Advertise | Jobs | Subscribe