In response to Edward Lowerys letter (Herald, Nov. 30), he only appears to be concerned about his mothers personal freedom. While I commend him for his devotion to his mother, what about the freedom of others to not breathe second-hand smoke? I have walked down Main Avenue countless times breathing in someone elses smoke.
Smoking is an addiction (or vice, habit, pastime people can justify their behavior with any number of terms). Just because you are addicted to a substance doesnt mean those of us who arent should be subjected to it.
Its funny how someone can expound about a perceived freedom without thinking about how it affects someone else.
Most cities and towns do not allow drinking in public places unless otherwise posted or permitted. I do not see why smoking should be exempted. People drinking do not generally subject others to second-hand alcohol exposure unless they trip and spill their drink on you.
Finally, I am a bit fed up with people threatening to boycott Durango. When I travel to another state, I expect to have to conform to their policies or laws. In California, I cannot speak on my mobile phone without a hands-free device (which I do not own) while driving. So I do not use my mobile phone when driving in California. Quite simple, really.